Manufacturers for Trade Enforcement calls on U.S. Department of Commerce to fairly assess China’s economic status.
The Arlington, Virginia-based The Aluminum Association says on its website, www.aluminum.org, where the coalition was announced, that “China has claimed that it should be automatically accorded treatment as if it were a market economy after the 15th anniversary of its accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO) in December 2016. U.S. law requires that the Department of Commerce make a market economy status (MES) determination based on established criteria, which many experts agree that China has not met.”
The Aluminum Association is one of eight current groups that have teamed together to voice opposition to the automatic granting of MES for China at the end of 2016.
“Our industries can compete against any other market-oriented competitors, but we cannot compete against the Chinese government,” says Heidi Brock, president and CEO of the The Aluminum Association. “The Chinese economy does not meet the basic requirements set forth by U.S. statutes and the Department of Commerce for a functioning market economy, and we will work together in this coalition to speak loudly, and with one strong voice, to prevent China from gaining a status that it does not yet deserve.”
- Alliance for American Manufacturing (AAM), Washington;
- The Aluminum Association;
- American Fiber Manufacturers Association (AFMA), Arlington, Virginia;
- American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI), Washington;
- Narrow Fabrics Institute (NFI), Roseville, Minnesota;
- National Council of Textile Organizations (NCTO), Washington;
- PET Resin Association, New York; and
- U.S. Industrial Fabrics Institute (USIFI), Roseville, Minnesota.
“The unfortunate reality is China continues to be a state-run economy in many respects, creating an unlevel playing field for manufacturers here at home,” says Thomas J. Gibson, president and CEO of AISI. “What we are calling for is a fair and accurate assessment of the Chinese economy—and we believe that will show that market economy status for China is not warranted at this time.”
Paul O’Day, president of the American Fiber Manufacturers Association, adds, “China has not taken appropriate steps over the past decade to warrant market economy status. Granting MES to China would not only violate global trade rules but also put a huge number of domestic manufacturing jobs at risk.”
State support of domestic manufacturing in China has distorted global markets, leading to significant oversupply and other issues that are hurting domestic manufacturers, according to The Aluminum Association. In the aluminum industry alone, eight U.S.-based aluminum smelters have curtailed or closed since the beginning of 2015, representing more than 60 percent of U.S. primary aluminum capacity and impacting more than 3,000 workers. In November, the AISI presented research performed by three North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)-region economists demonstrating the negative impact to the steel industry and related industries in North America of granting China market economy status before China has made the necessary market-oriented reforms to its economy.
According to MTE’s position statement, “Fair international competition and a level playing field are essential for the global competitiveness of U.S. manufacturers. Effective and predictable trade enforcement mechanisms must include the accurate assessment of and response to distortions from state-run or other nonmarket economies, which risk endangering U.S. jobs and the economy.”
MTE is a coalition of leading U.S. manufacturing associations united in opposing China’s request to automatically grant MES for the country at the end of 2016. U.S. law requires that the Department of Commerce make a MES determination based on established criteria, which China has not met. State support of domestic manufacturing in China has distorted global markets, hurting domestic manufacturers. For more information, visit www.tradeenforcement.org.